July 23, 2009
TO: Editor, McMinnville News-Register
Our County officials owe members of the Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC) an apology.
Last week, Commissioner Kathy George, Solid Waste Coordinator Sherrie Mathison, and SWAC chair Joe Cook publicly commented on George Duvendack's laudable decision to withdraw from future participation in official discussions of alternatives to the expansion of Riverbend Landfill. Duvendack withdrew from SWAC's meetings with Zia Engineering, the consultant hired by the County to evaluate alternative ways to dispose of Yamhill County's garbage, after citizens and the County Planning Department pointed out the potential for a conflict of interest that might jeopardize the landfill's petition to rezone neighboring farmland to allow the landfill to expand.
The News-Register quoted Mathison and Cook as declaring that Mr. Duvendack had no [] conflict. Mathison and Cook also slammed SWAC members who are area residents for having "a vested interest, just as Duvendack does" (Mathison) and a "larger conflict than I would have" (Cook).
Actually, it appears that Duvendack has two conflicts: Because he manages the landfill, the SWAC-Zia recommendations will affect his "private pecuniary benefit or detriment" (the legal standard). Because Duvendack represents the landfill in the rezoning case, he will benefit if a SWAC-Zia recommendation favors expansion.
State law excuses Duvendack from the first conflict. The same statute also excuses the other SWAC members Mathison and Cook criticized--all but Cook himself. As a paid consultant for Waste Management, Riverbend's parent, Cook has an actual conflict and no statute to excuse him. Similarly, I believe no law excuses Duvendack from the rezoning case conflict.
Cook should obey the legal remedy for a public official's conflict of interest: publicly "announce" the conflict and "refrain from participation" in future SWAC-Zia discussions and any recommendations SWAC makes. And our County officials should read the law.
Susan Watkins